CH23 − 1.5 to 5 Ton Indoor Coils / Page 2 FEATURES REFRIGERANT SYSTEM Coil Construction Durable copper tubing. Ripple-edged aluminum fins. Lanced fins provide maximum exposure of fin surface to air stream. Rifled tubing provides superior refrigerant flow. Slab coil construction. Non-corrosive drain pan with dual drain connections.

Santa Clara, CA: A Settlement has been reached with Lennox Industries Inc. ('Lennox') in a class action lawsuit about whether it manufactured and sold defective evaporator coils. An evaporator coil is a part of an air conditioning system or heat pump system in the cooling mode. Lennox denies all of the claims in the lawsuit, but has agreed to the Settlement to avoid the cost and risk of further litigation. The alleging its air conditioning units are susceptible to formicary corrosion as a result of the deficient materials used in the manufacture of its coils. The lawsuit further alleges that Lennox has not informed its customers of the defect, even when it is called to replace failed coils in existing units.

This conduct, the lawsuit claims, means that customers are unable to make informed decisions regarding the purchase of a Lennox Air Conditioner. The Settlement class includes all U.S. Residents who, between October 29, 2007 and July 9, 2015, purchased at least one new uncoated copper tube Lennox brand, Aire-Flo brand, Armstrong Air brand, AirEase brand, Concord brand, or Ducane brand evaporator coil, covered by an Original Warranty, for their personal, their family, or their household purposes, that was installed in a house, condominium unit, apartment unit, or other residential dwelling located in the United States. Original Coils may have been purchased separately, as part of an air handler, or they may have been included as part of a Packaged Unit. The final approval hearing is scheduled for December 2, 2015. The lawsuit is: Thomas v. Lennox Industries Inc., United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Case No.

For more information about the Settlement, visit: Legal Help If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please. This lawsuit settlement and payment is a bad joke. Our story is like all the rest. Brand new Lennox AC in October 2014.

Coil replaced October 2016. Overpriced job from Dunedin Refrigeration of Dunedin, FL.

Who have been totally unhelpful. Finally approved for a $75 rebate in July 2017. Radha soami sabd mp3 dwnlod. Have not seen a penny yet. It makes no sense that you are only reimbursed for the second replacement coil which would make it the third coil including the original.

Learned this long after submitting the paperwork and calls to Lennox (unanswered) and to the law firm and claim center which only has an automated message. No automobile recall would ever be allowed to be run like this. The whole settlement is set up to avoid any payment.

Don't think we will ever see any reimbursement without some intervention by the courts or government regulators. I actually had an email from them a few weeks ago informing me that my claim was deficient. They needed the Model/Serial # from the new coil, and they indicated that the Model/serial # of the old coil was invalid.

Well, I sent them a photo of the tag from the current coil and an old service invoice on which the technician had noted the info from the old one (most of my service invoices do not have that info). Have not heard back, but guess they are not accepting that. The old coil is long gone. They had mis-copied the original info I sent them. But my case still stands at Deficient, dated yesterday. So, here's the deal - Has anyone looked at the benefits available? It's hardly worth going to all this trouble over.